[CentOS] Re: kernels and irc

Tom Diehl tdiehl at rogueind.com
Thu Jun 5 19:28:44 UTC 2008


On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, James Bunnell wrote:

>
> On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 18:36 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>
>> James Bunnell wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 17:00 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
>>>> On May 22 it was estimated that it would take 3 weeks.  Did you really need an
>>>> update on that?
>>>
>>> i only asked. an answer such as what was given here earlier would have
>>> sufficed. is that so hard?
>>
>> But it is the same answer you already had!
>
> ok, let's look at this differently. if i were looking for a answer to
> these things from a standpoint of wanting to help, or pointing out
> something that may be perceived differently somewhere else such as the
> 'well they are updating 3-4, why not 5'...how is that to be construed? i
> think that deserves more than an aggressive response such as what
> happened on irc.

Not for nothin but I thought about 200 messages ago you said you were done?

PLEASE do not answer that. Silence would be the best answer.

Regards,

-- 
Tom Diehl		tdiehl at rogueind.com		Spamtrap address mtd123 at rogueind.com
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS at centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


More information about the CentOS mailing list