[CentOS] Re: 3ware performance in CentOS
ssilva at sgvwater.com
Thu Jun 19 22:07:14 UTC 2008
on 6-19-2008 1:05 PM Ruslan Sivak spake the following:
> Jim Perrin wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Florin Andrei
>> <florin at andrei.myip.org> wrote:
>>> Have a look at these pages:
>>> I'm comparing the default 5.1 64bit kernel with the patched one
>>> posted in
>>> the bug report (kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.bz321111.x86_64) and I
>>> don't quite
>>> see any significant difference in write performance for this command:
>> You are comparing the wrong kernels. The bz321111 kernel was for an
>> NFS related bug and has no 3 impact on 3ware performance. The redhat
>> bug report has the kernels built for 3ware performance. Once 5.2 is
>> rolled out, Johnny Hughes has stated he would consider building a
>> kernel for the 444759 bug.
> How would I know if I'm affected by this bug? I'm using the 9690SA
Does the stock drivers even support that controller yet?
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 258 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080619/c147d8a0/signature.bin
More information about the CentOS