On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 10:45 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 09:24 +0200, centos at bartbaars.nl wrote: > >> Removing perl.i386 fixed this... > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Ralph Angenendt" <ra+centos at br-online.de> > >> To: centos at centos.org > >> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 8:34:11 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern / Rome / Stockholm / Vienna > >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Upgrade perl; package conflict > >> > >> Phil Schaffner wrote: > >>> On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 08:55 +0200, centos at bartbaars.nl wrote: > >>>> I'm working on upgrading my Xen Domain0 to CentOs 5.2. However, yum > >>>> update gives me a package conflict on perl: > >>> ... > >>>> Using a x86_64 install btw. > >>>> > >>>> Anyone seen this one?? > >>> Please don't hijack threads with a "Reply" when starting a new topic. > >>> > >>> This problem is due to the lack of an i386 RPM in x86_64 repos. See > >>> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2918 > >> perl.i386 is *now* in the extras repository (as stated by the Release > >> Notes) which is enabled by default. As it is not in upstream's x86_64 > >> tree, it's not going into the CentOS os/ or updates/ tree either. > >> > >> That's why I closed that bug again. > >> > >> Ralph > >> > > > > Ralph, > > > > I am still having this same problem. The only non-CentOS package I have > > installed is Astro::Time via cpan. I have looked at the bug report but > > am not sure what to do next. I have two x86_64 units that still have > > the problem. > > > > Any ideas? > > > > Greg > > Do you not have extras enabled on this machine? > > _______________________________________________ Yes I do have extra's enabled.