On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 at 7:03am, Johnny Hughes wrote > I would also not use XFS in production ... but that is just me. If XFS was > production ready, it would be in RHEL. Since it is turned on in Fedora and > since it is purposely turned off in RHEL, one can reasonably conclude that > the upstream people DO NOT THINK it is stable enough to use in production on > RHEL. This is JUST my opinion :D IIRC, RH's stated reason (stated on the mailing lists in the midst of folks clamoring for XFS' inclusion) for not having XFS turned on in RHEL is *not* that it's not production ready. It's that they only have the resources (read: folks with knowledge in-depth enough to satisfy enterprise customers) to support 1 FS, and that's ext3. -- Joshua Baker-LePain QB3 Shared Cluster Sysadmin UCSF