On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 17:00 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > James Bunnell wrote: > > I was in the #centos-social channel and simply stated that I noticed > > CentOS 3-4 were getting a lot of updates. I also stated that the CentOS > > 5 was one kernel behind, as in RHEL it is at -53, the gentlemen then > > told me that I was wrong and it was at -21. > > lftp ftp.redhat.com:/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS> ls kernel* > kernel.list > lftp ftp.redhat.com:/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS> exit > [angenenr at shutdown ~]$grep 53 kernel.list > -rw-rw-r-- 2 ftp ftp 54464006 Feb 12 14:37 kernel-2.6.18-53.1.13.el5.src.rpm > -rw-rw-r-- 2 ftp ftp 54492476 Mar 03 09:40 kernel-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5.src.rpm > -rw-rw-r-- 2 ftp ftp 54521781 May 04 07:52 kernel-2.6.18-53.1.19.el5.src.rpm > -rw-rw-r-- 2 ftp ftp 54540423 May 19 09:58 kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.src.rpm > -rw-rw-r-- 2 ftp ftp 54421174 Nov 28 2007 kernel-2.6.18-53.1.4.el5.src.rpm > -rw-rw-r-- 2 ftp ftp 54461630 Jan 18 11:29 kernel-2.6.18-53.1.6.el5.src.rpm > -rw-rw-r-- 1 ftp ftp 54386174 Oct 11 2007 kernel-2.6.18-53.el5.src.rpm > [angenenr at shutdown ~]$ > > So which kernel would that -53 be? The one from October 11th, 2007? look like they are all -53 to me, i dont see the point. > > > I then asked if there was a way to get a progress report somehow on > > 5.2, and that 5.2 has already upgraded that kernel. The result was > > that I was banned for being correct. > > a) #centos-social is not a support channel, as that channel's topic > clearly states. > > b) The ban was *not* for you being correct (because you are not, 5.2 > will have 2.6.18-92, but for your behaviour over the last days/weeks and > your *constantly* asking about progress on 5.2 (and getting the answer > everybody getsdoes, see http://planet.centos.org/). > > > I dont understand this kind of support. > > I don't understand why you came here to whine about that. weeks,days, ive been quiet. i believe you too have overreacted. its been nearly 2 weeks since any update of progress to 5.2 has been announced. why would that be rude or wrong to ask for? and btw, i am not the only one that has asked for an update. and ive been polite in my initial questions. response determines response. > > Ralph > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080605/bee4bf2a/attachment-0005.html>