Once I build a system and bring it to our defined baseline, I rarely use rpm from that point forward...I custom roll almost everything -- especially apache. (red hat's layout makes my skin crawl) When did CPAN become so bad? It was the defacto standard and source of truth for perl modules 10 years ago. I trust CPAN over any rpm provided by red hat. Maybe things have changed, it has been several years since I got down and dirty with perl modules... Anyway, problem is solved by changing perl -w to simply just perl. Since this system is buried behind 2 pix firewalls and only used for internal use Im not to concerned. On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 5:18 AM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:50 AM, Ralph Angenendt <ra+centos at br-online.de<ra%2Bcentos at br-online.de>> > wrote: > > Chuck wrote: > >> I am using the CPAN version of CGI: > > > > But why? The perl package in CentOS provides CGI. > > ...And here is my favorite quote. Jim Perrin explains why CPAN should > be avoided: > > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-February/075417.html > > Akemi > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- Chuck Carson - Sr. Systems Administrator Northrop Grumman Austin, Texas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080619/23f363a2/attachment-0005.html>