on 6-19-2008 1:05 PM Ruslan Sivak spake the following: > Jim Perrin wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Florin Andrei >> <florin at andrei.myip.org> wrote: >> >>> Have a look at these pages: >>> >>> http://www.bofh-hunter.com/2008/06/13/3ware-performance-in-centos/ >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444759 >>> >>> I'm comparing the default 5.1 64bit kernel with the patched one >>> posted in >>> the bug report (kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.bz321111.x86_64) and I >>> don't quite >>> see any significant difference in write performance for this command: >>> >> >> You are comparing the wrong kernels. The bz321111 kernel was for an >> NFS related bug and has no 3 impact on 3ware performance. The redhat >> bug report has the kernels built for 3ware performance. Once 5.2 is >> rolled out, Johnny Hughes has stated he would consider building a >> kernel for the 444759 bug. >> >> > How would I know if I'm affected by this bug? I'm using the 9690SA > controller. > Russ Does the stock drivers even support that controller yet? -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 258 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080619/c147d8a0/attachment-0005.sig>