On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:05:11AM +1000, Gavin Carr wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 07:15:00AM -0400, William L. Maltby wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 03:48 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > > Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> > > > I do not know the command line for symbolic links. I created the
> > > > symbolic link of /Centos/5 to /Centos/5.1 in Nautilus which does not
> > > > have a method of changing a symbolic link. Only deleting it and
> > > > creating a new one.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Not that I know of, I always just delete an recreate it using "rm -f"
> > > and "ln -s" at the command line.
> >
> > It used to be that the -f worked. Sometime in the past that disappeared.
> > Bad decision, IMHO.
>
> It's still there:
>
> nox:~/tmp/ln$ touch foo
> nox:~/tmp/ln$ touch bar
> nox:~/tmp/ln$ ln -s foo baz
> nox:~/tmp/ln$ ll
> total 12
> -rw-r--r-- 1 gavin gavin 0 Jun 26 10:06 bar
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 gavin gavin 3 Jun 26 10:06 baz -> foo
> -rw-r--r-- 1 gavin gavin 0 Jun 26 10:06 foo
> nox:~/tmp/ln$ ln -sf bar baz
> nox:~/tmp/ln$ ll
> total 12
> -rw-r--r-- 1 gavin gavin 0 Jun 26 10:06 bar
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 gavin gavin 3 Jun 26 10:06 baz -> bar
> -rw-r--r-- 1 gavin gavin 0 Jun 26 10:06 foo
>
>
> It does seem to be flaky though. I definitely have had times it hasn't
> worked recently.
If there's already a link to a directory, you need -n (usually);
-n, --no-dereference
treat destination that is a symlink to a directory as if
it were a normal file
Otherwise, you'll end up with a rogue link inside the existing directory:
mikaelf at mikaelf:/tmp/ln$ ln -sf foo link
mikaelf at mikaelf:/tmp/ln$ ls -lR
.:
total 8
drwxr-xr-x 2 mikaelf mikaelf 4096 2008-06-26 11:19 bar
drwxr-xr-x 2 mikaelf mikaelf 4096 2008-06-26 11:16 foo
lrwxrwxrwx 1 mikaelf mikaelf 3 2008-06-26 11:19 link -> bar
./bar:
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 mikaelf mikaelf 3 2008-06-26 11:19 foo -> foo
./foo:
total 0
--
Fridh