Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 09:24 +0200, centos at bartbaars.nl wrote: >> Removing perl.i386 fixed this... >> >> Thanks! >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Ralph Angenendt" <ra+centos at br-online.de> >> To: centos at centos.org >> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 8:34:11 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern / Rome / Stockholm / Vienna >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Upgrade perl; package conflict >> >> Phil Schaffner wrote: >>> On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 08:55 +0200, centos at bartbaars.nl wrote: >>>> I'm working on upgrading my Xen Domain0 to CentOs 5.2. However, yum >>>> update gives me a package conflict on perl: >>> ... >>>> Using a x86_64 install btw. >>>> >>>> Anyone seen this one?? >>> Please don't hijack threads with a "Reply" when starting a new topic. >>> >>> This problem is due to the lack of an i386 RPM in x86_64 repos. See >>> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2918 >> perl.i386 is *now* in the extras repository (as stated by the Release >> Notes) which is enabled by default. As it is not in upstream's x86_64 >> tree, it's not going into the CentOS os/ or updates/ tree either. >> >> That's why I closed that bug again. >> >> Ralph >> > > Ralph, > > I am still having this same problem. The only non-CentOS package I have > installed is Astro::Time via cpan. I have looked at the bug report but > am not sure what to do next. I have two x86_64 units that still have > the problem. > > Any ideas? > > Greg Do you not have extras enabled on this machine? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 251 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080629/8cbe4daa/attachment-0005.sig>