[CentOS] RE: Choice of RAR/PAR utility?
Anne Wilson
cannewilson at googlemail.comFri Mar 7 21:38:06 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] RE: Choice of RAR/PAR utility?
- Next message: [CentOS] RE: Choice of RAR/PAR utility?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Friday 07 March 2008 20:01:02 Frank Cox wrote: > On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 19:46:14 +0000 > > Anne Wilson <cannewilson at googlemail.com> wrote: > > On Friday 07 March 2008 19:19:46 Frank Cox wrote: > > > On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 12:51:13 -0600 > > > > > > Matt <lm7812 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Is there a free windows utillity that will decrypt gpg? > > > > > > gpg > > > > pgp > > Not necessarily. > > http://gnupg.org/faq.html#q5.1 Interesting. Is it still valid? I see the copyright notice is 2002-2004. Is there good documentation on using gpg with windows? Anne -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080307/6204e2d1/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] RE: Choice of RAR/PAR utility?
- Next message: [CentOS] RE: Choice of RAR/PAR utility?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list