[CentOS] RE: Choice of RAR/PAR utility?
Anne Wilson
cannewilson at googlemail.comSat Mar 8 07:49:50 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] RE: Choice of RAR/PAR utility?
- Next message: [CentOS] Problem getting Java Runtime Environment installed into OpenOffice
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Friday 07 March 2008 22:53:03 Frank Cox wrote: > On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 21:38:06 +0000 > > Anne Wilson <cannewilson at googlemail.com> wrote: > > Interesting. Is it still valid? I see the copyright notice is > > 2002-2004. > > Since it's included in the documentation on the program's development > website and there has been no superseding documentation, I'll let you draw > your own conclusion. > > > Is there good documentation on using gpg with windows? > > Running "gpg windows' thorough google yields a lot of relevant-looking > materials. I see five tutorials and descriptions on the very first > page of results. Interesting. I didn't google, as I have no interest myself, but I'm sure the info will be useful in the archives. Anne -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080308/ea6f78c0/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] RE: Choice of RAR/PAR utility?
- Next message: [CentOS] Problem getting Java Runtime Environment installed into OpenOffice
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list