[CentOS] Re: new CentOS5.1, samba help requested
John R Pierce
pierce at hogranch.comThu Mar 27 19:20:14 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: new CentOS5.1, samba help requested
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: new CentOS5.1, samba help requested
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Scott Silva wrote: > NFS will be much better for the linux to linux connections because it > passes native system calls on the files instead of a protocol that is > emulated and made to work. also, the following significant difference in user semantics between SMB/CIFS and NFS.... in SMB, the client-initiated session authenticates as a user on the server.... in a multiuser windows system, each user would have his own session to a given server. This doesn't play very well in Unix environments where the file system mounts are global to all users. in NFS, each file opened has user ID, group ID, so its more suitable for a multiuser environment on a single session. HOWEVER, its critical that all systems participating in NFS have the SAME user #s group #s, hence its often used in conjunction with NIS or another shared identity system.
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: new CentOS5.1, samba help requested
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: new CentOS5.1, samba help requested
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list