on 3-6-2008 3:58 PM Scott R. Ehrlich spake the following: > So I've learned a valuable RAID 0 lesson, and it fortunately was not a > major catastrophy. I got lucky, and had a workable-enough backup on > tape to make the user who needed some data happy. > > Now, from the OS side, LVM is an option. Say the RAID controller only > allows hardware striping or mirroring for logical volumes, but I want to > use more than two disks, and I don't want the RAID 0 problem again. > > When I get a replacement disk and build the system from the ground up > again, I could, conceivably, use hardware RAID 1 for the OS on two > disks, and CentOS 5 64-bit's LVM for software RAID 5 (or maybe 1+0 if > available) on the remaining for 4 disks, maybe 3 disks as active and the > 4th as a hot spare? > > I've never had much faith in software raid, since it is not > hardware-based, and there would be a performance hit, but in this case, > it could be an option. > > Insights from the OS-created RAID experience welcome. > > Thanks again. > > Scott Raid 0 is never a good option for data you need to keep. It is great if you need fast access to scratch data, though. Software raid in linux is very mature and works wonderfully, and has the benefit of being able to move all the drives to a different system and being able to start up the array without needing the controller. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 250 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080306/f919b37a/attachment-0004.sig>