Karanbir Singh wrote: > in the case of rsyslog, thats not the case :D I had a play with the 3.x > tree today, and it *looks* ok to me. So might as well inflict it upon > everyone else considering its in the Testing Repo, no sane person will > use it in Production. Right ? > > I shall have updated packages in a couple of days, prolly over the > weekend. The package queue is quite long at the moment. I've got mine working finally, but I definitely look forward to seeing v3 in your testing repo! Let me know if I can help in any way. >> Basically, I want to be able to log locally AND remotely. AFAICT, I >> have to move to v3 to get this feature. > > err, really ? you could do that with conventional syslog too. Yes, strange but correct. Still, rsyslog gives me other features over conventional syslog, not the least of which you mention yourself: > also, running over tcp is nicer, since you atleast now get a chance to > do something about bits that dont make it. ... that, and it also allows me to run over stunnel. Thanks again, johnn