[CentOS] RHEL on The Pirate Bay, Mininova, etc

Sun Mar 23 12:28:27 UTC 2008
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com>

On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 07:02 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> > I think you guys are going about it the wrong way. You're so focused on
> > the *contents* of the packages that you're missing the packages
> > *themselves*. Could the signing of the packages be considered a "work",
> > and therefore distribution of said signed packages be a violation of
> > copyright law?
> Well ... the general consensus is that is not the case, and that the 
> SPEC file is covered under the same license as the rest of the source 
> code unless it is specifically licensed differently.

I'm not talking about the spec file metadata, I'm talking about the
signature that's applied to the package itself.

Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com>

PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080323/1081cc3e/attachment-0005.sig>