Johnny Hughes wrote:
> copyright law?
>
> Well ... the general consensus is that is not the case, and that the
> SPEC file is covered under the same license as the rest of the source
> code unless it is specifically licensed differently.
>
> So, distributing the RPMS (the GPL ones) would probably be OK.
>
> Using them is also OK, so long as you PAY Red Hat on every machine where
> you use things that cam from RHN.
By why is adding a restriction to enforce that OK, unless it only
applies to the non-GPL'd portions?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com