[CentOS] RAID5 or RAID50 for database?
Rudi Ahlers
Rudi at SoftDux.comSun May 25 10:50:38 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] RAID5 or RAID50 for database?
- Next message: [CentOS] RAID5 or RAID50 for database?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Christopher Chan wrote: > >> Why are you still using CentOS 4? >> > > Do you have an issue with Centos 4? I prefer to wait for RH to work > most of the kinks with their new releases. Centos 5 has new versions > of various libraries and software. They have never been able to > guarantee zero breakage. Eg: I have heard of constantly crashing > firefox. A known issue too. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Just asking. I don't use CentOS as a desktop OS, so the firefox problem doesn't bother me at all, but CentOS 5 is an upgrade in many regards, and I find it very stable. I have yet to try RAID10 with it though, as soon as I can get my hands on enough spare HDD's :) -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers CEO, SoftDux Web: http://www.SoftDux.com Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other technical stuff, or visit http://www.WebHostingTalk.co.za for Web Hosting stuff
- Previous message: [CentOS] RAID5 or RAID50 for database?
- Next message: [CentOS] RAID5 or RAID50 for database?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list