[CentOS] Re: RAID5 or RAID50 for database?
Nikolay Ulyanitsky
lystor at lystor.org.uaSun May 25 19:29:52 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: RAID5 or RAID50 for database?
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: RAID5 or RAID50 for database?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I can not comment on "most vendors" but for the PROGRESS RDBMS RAID5 > is definitely not recommended. It will work but you will see a > significant reduction in performance. We strongly recommend that our > clients go with RAID10 (as in RAID 1+0). In-house we only use RAID10. +1 Write performance of RAID5 on hardware MegaRAID SATA 150-6D is *very* poor. -- Nikolay Ulyanitsky <lystor at lystor.org.ua>
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: RAID5 or RAID50 for database?
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: RAID5 or RAID50 for database?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list