[CentOS] Re: 40 second delay on automounts with 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 kernel
Scott Silva
ssilva at sgvwater.comThu May 29 20:02:16 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] 40 second delay on automounts with 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 kernel
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: 40 second delay on automounts with 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 kernel
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
on 5-29-2008 12:42 PM Ned Slider spake the following: > Joe Pruett wrote: >> On Thu, 29 May 2008, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >>> This is already solved on another thread ... but for closure on this >>> one, there is a known bug here with that kernel and ipsec: >>> >>> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2853 >> >> that bug entry does say to use the upstream bug for info about a >> workaround, but the upstream bug is blocked to mere mortals. is there >> a workaround other than just using the older kernel? > > > Did you see the added note? > > I quote: > > "For the benefit of those who do not have access to the upstream > bugzilla report, this bug has been fixed in the updated 5.2 kernel > (version number 2.6.18-92.el5), and this kernel also contains the > CVE-2007-6282 patch. I would recommend that people affected by this bug > upgrade to 2.6.18-92.el5." Is that the kernel to be released with 5.2? -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 258 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/897a60d3/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] 40 second delay on automounts with 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 kernel
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: 40 second delay on automounts with 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 kernel
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list