Thanks much, I have in the past compiled my own but thought I would check. A big THANKS to whoever provides them... On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Tom Bishop <bishoptf at gmail.com> wrote: > > OK, so I need to bring up a new vm and was wondering what the state of vm > > kernels for centos. I have read this > http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2189 > > about the tick divider but it wasn't clear what the best step forward is > for > > centos 5.1 was, i usually ran with the clocksource=pit option and it > looked > > like that and the divider option caused a problem. I have in the past > > compiled my own but was wondering what others were now doing, thanks in > > advance 8-) > > Thanks to Tru, kernel-vm is all up-to-date and you can find it here: > > http://people.centos.org/tru/kernel-vm/ > > and yes, using the clocksource=pit option should not be an issue with > these kernels. > > Akemi > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080527/86f51f74/attachment-0004.html>