On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 04:20:46PM -0500, Doug Tucker wrote: > Tru, > Hi Doug, > I work at a university. They don't provide enough money for test > environments :). Sure, but they could probably understand if it's 'critical' ;) > Just kinda odd, last time kernel update, gfs updated > at the same time so all was well. But twice now kernel has upgraded CentOS can't rebuild if upstream hasn't released the corresponding src.rpm. Upstream's GFS is often released later than the kernel RHSA... > with no GFS so it went bye-bye. Is the GFS being installed, compiled > against particular kernel headers, or could I just copy the /fs/gfs > and /fs/gfs_locking to the new kernel /lib/modules (or symlink for that > matter) and be lucky enough it would work? No idea. Cheers, Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080512/31fff7b9/attachment-0005.sig>