Doug Tucker wrote: > My whole issue is around GFS, which is officially supported (someone > else hijacked this thread with XFS which got more attention), and in my > statement I said: "Keep in mind this is not an unsupported XFS that > someone hijacked my thread with." So I'm agreeing that XFS should never > be brought up in the same fashion as GFS, as it is not a supported file > system. GFS is, and it is my opinion RH should release the 2 together. > GFS is only 'officially supported' under a seperate $$$$ contract from Red Hat. And, if you're a GFS customer of Red Hat's, I'm pretty darn sure the first thing they do is disable kernel updates... In fact, I seem to recall that RHEL4 ships with kernel updates disabled, you have to use `up2date --force` or something to enable them.