-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Les Mikesell wrote: | Milton Calnek wrote: |> |> |> MHR wrote: |> | On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:03 AM, Anne Wilson |> <cannewilson at googlemail.com> wrote: |> |> Labeling in gmail doesn't help if you are forwarding to an |> Outlook account, |> |> though. |> |> | Also, it would be nice if all lists used good subject labeling the way |> | the CentOS and yum lists do (and not, e.g., the rpmforge list, which |> | uses "users" exactly the same way that OOo does, making them |> | impossible to distinguish from the subject alone, or the gnome list |> | which has no tags at all). |> | |> That's what procmail is for... |> |> # |> # Mail Scanner |> # |> :0 hfw |> * ^Return-Path: <mailscanner-bounces at list.mailscanner.info> |> |sed -e 's/^Subject:/Subject: \[MailScanner\]/' |> | | What will that look like after someone uses it replies a few times on | the same thread? Good point. I guess other subscribers don't do it that way, else I'd have noticed it. Maybe sed -re 's/^Subject: (^\[MailScanner\])/Subject: \[MailScanner\]/' The ^ and the ( may need to be reversed... I'm not sure. | - -- Milton Calnek BSc, A/Slt(Ret.) milton at calnek.com 306-717-8737 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFILIvRHgnbf2T2QqMRAqRMAKC+D2ntHMew/JoPQ1sIjJp4h6yipACfZmX3 ViSAmnUQn/1ba8znJeTvBFg= =o/4P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.