John R Pierce wrote: > drbd is asynchronous replication, isn't it? so if the active 'master' > fails just as its written and acknowledged an incoming message, that > message could be lost if the replication hasn't completed by the time of > failure ? I believe you can run DRBD so primary writes dont return till the secondary write also completes. No idea how that impacts performance :D -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq