William Warren wrote: > I'm not a fan of RAID 5 at all since it can only tolerate one failure at > all. Go with raid 10 or something like that which is able to handle > more than one failure. Intermittent, uncorrectable sector failures > during rebuilds are becoming an increasing problem with today's drives. > Is that raid10 or raid 1+0 or raid 0+1? :D At least for the latter two, their handling more than one failure depends on which disks blow. Not sure how the raid10 module handles things.