Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Tom Bishop <bishoptf at gmail.com> wrote: > >> OK, so I need to bring up a new vm and was wondering what the state of vm >> kernels for centos. I have read this http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2189 >> about the tick divider but it wasn't clear what the best step forward is for >> centos 5.1 was, i usually ran with the clocksource=pit option and it looked >> like that and the divider option caused a problem. I have in the past >> compiled my own but was wondering what others were now doing, thanks in >> advance 8-) >> > > Thanks to Tru, kernel-vm is all up-to-date and you can find it here: > > http://people.centos.org/tru/kernel-vm/ > > and yes, using the clocksource=pit option should not be an issue with > these kernels. > > Akemi > So if I understand this correctly, one should not be using a stock kernel when running inside a vm, but should use the kernel-vm kernel? Russ