2 questions: a) Must I put the same IP with 3 "virtual macs" under the same interface? b) Must the ARP entry be changed in the bridges? In the computers? Regards El Mie, 28 de Mayo de 2008, 18:12, Lorenzo Quatrini escribió: > ArcosCom Linux User ha scritto: > >> >> I observed that all TSn IP's has their ARP entry in the ARP table, but >> the >> IP for load balancing not. >> >> How can I solve this problem at the bridge level? I think that there is >> something that the bridges are filtering and perhaps is because the TS >> load balancing software uses various "virtual macs" for the load >> balancing >> IP. >> > > I had a similar issue with a Cisco router; the solution was to add an > entry on > the arp table for the IP for load balancing and the "virtual" ethernet > address > of the cluster. (You can find them on the properties of the cluster) > > I guess you could use /etc/ether to make the mapping persistent. > > Regards > > Lorenzo Quatrini > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >