[CentOS] re: HA Storage
Stephen Harris
lists at spuddy.orgSun Nov 9 16:38:47 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] re: HA Storage
- Next message: [CentOS] re: HA Storage
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 08:30:42AM -0800, nate wrote: > Stephen Harris wrote: > > > ZFS is really nice. If VMware was supported on Solaris 86 then I > > would have built my own home server with Solaris rather than CentOS. > > (Although I'm not using VMware on that machine, at present; merely > > UserModeLinux for my protected instances). But CentOS is handling my > > 5*1Tbyte RAID5 OK for now :-) > > You know the inverse is true right? Solaris is supported on > VMWare ESX(i). Though SATA disks are not officially supported > by the VMFS file system in 3.x. I wanted Solaris as the Host OS so it could natively manage my disks via ZFS. Making it a guest would be pointless. Underneath that I would run a couple of smaller Linux instances (eg for internet facing services), maybe a Windows instance and so on. -- rgds Stephen
- Previous message: [CentOS] re: HA Storage
- Next message: [CentOS] re: HA Storage
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list