[CentOS] XFS or JFS on CentOS 5?
Toby Bluhm
tkb at alltechmedusa.comThu Nov 20 16:22:34 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] XFS or JFS on CentOS 5?
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: XFS or JFS on CentOS 5?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jiann-Ming Su wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 3:34 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck > <l.wandrebeck at gmail.com> wrote: >> Outside more up-to-date question, here is my own experience with jfs/xfs. . . . > The only thing I don't like about ext3 is the fsck. On relatively > small filesystems, it's an annoyance. But on huge filesystem, > 500-1000GB, a system may take a long, long time to come back up. If you use ext3 on lvm, you can do a background fsck. http://markmail.org/message/5ipnsva3xkdyzzfy -- tkb
- Previous message: [CentOS] XFS or JFS on CentOS 5?
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: XFS or JFS on CentOS 5?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list