[CentOS] XFS or JFS on CentOS 5?
Sorin Srbu
sorin.srbu at orgfarm.uu.seFri Nov 21 08:32:24 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] XFS or JFS on CentOS 5?
- Next message: [CentOS] XFS or JFS on CentOS 5?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jiann-Ming Su <> scribbled on Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:59 PM: > The only thing I don't like about ext3 is the fsck. On relatively > small filesystems, it's an annoyance. But on huge filesystem, > 500-1000GB, a system may take a long, long time to come back up. Even on smaller 200GB-systems this takes annoyingly long time, but I see the need why one would occasionally want to run this anyway. Last time I rebooted one of our servers to get a new kernel loaded, I was told at boot that it'd been some 400days or so since the last fsck. After such a long time you might want to do the forced check anyway, just in case. It's for your own good. 8-) -- /Sorin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 5126 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20081121/ce695dbf/attachment-0001.bin>
- Previous message: [CentOS] XFS or JFS on CentOS 5?
- Next message: [CentOS] XFS or JFS on CentOS 5?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list