[CentOS] Re: hda: no DRQ after issuing WRITE
Matt
lm7812 at gmail.comSat Nov 22 01:02:23 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: hda: no DRQ after issuing WRITE
- Next message: [CentOS] any ima ge software suggestion
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>> Also the fact that the drive is showing up as /dev/hda instead of /dev/sda >>> means that you are not using the best driver for the hard drive. Go into the >>> bios and try either native mode to serial ATA or SATA AHCI enable. >>> You might need to rebuild the initrd from a rescue disk after you boot. >> >>>>native mode to serial ATA >> >> Did that. Now it shows up as sda again. I no longer get the errors >> either but I get this now. >> >> [root at server log]# hdparm -i /dev/sda >> >> /dev/sda: >> HDIO_GET_IDENTITY failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device >> >> Smartd also complains on boot up. >> > > Smartd is not that smart - it has known issues with SATA drives, as I > have posted on in this group recently. > > I ran smartctl and Seatool (from Seagate, since mine is a Seagate > drive) tests on it and had no problems. Of course, my WD and Hitachi > SATA drives don't do this, so maybe it is peculiar to Seagates.... Smartd is having a fit about Seek_Error_Rate. Like you said from looking at a few google searches this is normal with Seagate drives and does not mean they will fail. I think I may be close to having most issues straightened out with this messy upgrade. My iostats are still 3 times higher then prior to upgrade though. Is it perhaps an issue that Centos 4.7 does not support the Intel ICH9R SATA controller very well? Thanks. Matt
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: hda: no DRQ after issuing WRITE
- Next message: [CentOS] any ima ge software suggestion
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list