[CentOS] Location of 5.2 .iso without XEN

Sat Nov 22 16:53:54 UTC 2008
Sam Drinkard <sam at wa4phy.net>


Vandaman wrote:
> Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>
>   
>> Do not install "Virtualization" and you won't
>> have xen. There are no 
>> different ISOs for "with xen" and "without
>> xen".
>>
>>     
>
> This means that the OP did not even bother checking the responses
> to his question.
>
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-November/068124.html
>
> even looking at the recent kernel updates one can see for themselves :-
>
> x86_64:
> kernel-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5.x86_64.rpm
> kernel-debug-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5.x86_64.rpm
> kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5.x86_64.rpm
> kernel-devel-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5.x86_64.rpm
> kernel-doc-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5.noarch.rpm
> kernel-headers-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5.x86_64.rpm
> kernel-xen-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5.x86_64.rpm
> kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5.x86_64.rpm
>
> Regards,
> Vandaman.
>
>
>
>       
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
>   
Not to start a pissing contest, but I can assure you, I've read every 
response to my question.  I did not reply to each and every one because 
there is no need to duplicate answers.  As for "seeing things" No, I did 
not see anything related to virtualization when I started the install.  
My fault that I missed it, but sometimes we tend to take things on the 
fly and I'm sure while you've never missed anything ever, at least I'll 
'fess up to it..

Sam