Am 02.11.2008 um 20:57 schrieb Lanny Marcus: > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Michael Semcheski > <mhsemcheski at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Glenn <centos at 1bigadmin.biz> wrote: >>> At 02:57 PM 10/31/2008, you wrote: >>> >>> I recommend taking a good look at Digicam. For the types of tasks >>> listed above, its very good and fairly easy. It also supports bulk >>> processing, tagging images, etc. >>> >>> Its part image database and part image manipulator. >>> >>> Link? Please? Digicam gives too many hits on search engine even with >>> refining the search. >>> (Lurking and inquisitive) >> >> Sorry, I did mean Digikam. As you might imply from the k >> substituting >> for the c, its a KDE application (although it works fine in a gnome >> environment.) >> >> www.digikam.org > > Michael: Thank you. I will look into Digikam. At first, I thought > (assumed) the camcorder we were going to get was MiniDV, but, it uses > mini DVDs. I have a co-worker who also has such a camcorder. He hates it;-) Because to edit these films, you've basically got to re-rip these DVDs.... Rainer