Vandaman wrote: > Dag Wieers wrote: > >> We did not do anything. It is a bug in the priorities >> plugin. >> >> The reason we have a perl-DBD-mysql is because that is the >> upstream name and the naming convention dictates to use the >> upstream name. That is the only reliable way for not having >> RPM clashes. >> >> Maybe someone should report to Red Hat that perl-DBD-MySQL >> has a packaging bug ? >> >> http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBD-mysql/ >> > > What is the bug? It does not appear in the site you linked to. > It would be surprising if Red Hat are unaware of upstream changes > as one would expect it to be rolled out into Fedora rawhide at least > even if the changes are backported int RHEL. *packaging bug* the link shows that upstream is named all lowercase for mysql, so the rpm should also.