Ray Van Dolson wrote: > Thanks for the reply John. However, my question wasn't so much "if I > should" but how the xfs support in CentOS compares to jfs. It seems to > me that xfs is a bit more up-to-date. Couple of points from my side of the line: I use xfs, i dont use jfs. but only on x86_64 xfs in centos has eyeball attention from some people who are and previously have been involved with xfs upstream ( sgi ) xfs in CentOS is more widely used than jfs is in centos ( impression I get from looking at logs on and off - generated at mirror.centos.org ). Having said all this, I know atleast 1 person who is indeed running jfs at the moment with CentOS5. And I am sure there are usecase's where Jfs is a better option than Xfs. Does this help answer the question ? - KB