[CentOS] ejabberd 2.0.2 vs SELinux vs CentOS 5

[Karanbir Singh]

Damian S wrote:
> Just one final thing (hope it helps someone in future), according to Dan
> Walsh, much better (more fine-grained) than setting the allow_execmem
> boolean is to do this:
> chcon -t unconfined_execmem_exec_t /opt/ejabberd-2.0.2_2/bin/beam.smp

And file this as something the rpm packager needs to look at for 
ejabberd, its not a bug in CentOS.


-- 
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/  : 2522219 at icq