[CentOS] new list proposal - meaningless

[Karanbir Singh]

Spike Turner wrote:
> perhaps that is why "core" issues in CentOS like the kernel 
> and samba are ignored by the developers? Examples :-
> 
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-October/066143.html

Thats a bit of a dribveby waste of space post that does not really merit 
a reply from anyone. Also if that was something that concerns you so 
much, what have you done about it ?

> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-October/066154.html

Johnny has been working on those.

> If the CentOS devs don't have time to answer key questions such as
> on the kernel but have time to consider fragmenting the mailing list
> who wins/loses?

What barriers did you run into when you tried to help with the situation 
and try to be a better member of the community ?

- KB