[CentOS] Apache Charset vs html file charset
Ralph Angenendt
ra+centos at br-online.deThu Oct 9 08:38:18 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] Apache Charset vs html file charset
- Next message: [CentOS] Apache Charset vs html file charset
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Spike Turner wrote on Wed, 8 Oct 2008 23:00:54 -0700 (PDT): > > > The apache docs state that it does no harm > > well, that's wrong. Change alle your pages to be UTF-8 or remove it. Yepp. Most charset problems I've found within apache came from that setting. <http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/en/mod/core.html#adddefaultcharset> says that it can do harm. Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20081009/448855e2/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] Apache Charset vs html file charset
- Next message: [CentOS] Apache Charset vs html file charset
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list