[CentOS] OT: is parted reliable?
Jussi Hirvi
greenspot at greenspot.fiWed Oct 15 12:31:23 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] OT: is parted reliable?
- Next message: [CentOS] Centos 5x ipv6 sendmail smtps
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Guest (notconfusedaboutthattoday at gmail.com) kirjoitteli (15.10.2008 15:05): > It's your guys' list, but if you habitually err on the side of > rejecting interested newcomers, you'll eventually run out of > newcomers. I agree - I enjoy reading about the insights of experienced users, even when nobody is having an urgent, specific problem. Smalltalk greatly helps create a kind of community feeling. :-) I see no problem with it, especially when the OT prefix is used. - Jussi -- Jussi Hirvi * Green Spot Topeliuksenkatu 15 C * 00250 Helsinki * Finland Tel. & fax +358 9 493 981 * Mobile +358 40 771 2098 (only sms) jussi.hirvi at greenspot.fi * http://www.greenspot.fi
- Previous message: [CentOS] OT: is parted reliable?
- Next message: [CentOS] Centos 5x ipv6 sendmail smtps
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list