[CentOS] Re: OT: is parted reliable?
Scott Silva
ssilva at sgvwater.comWed Oct 15 17:19:44 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] OT: is parted reliable?
- Next message: [CentOS] OT: is parted reliable?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
on 10-15-2008 7:54 AM bruce spake the following: > thank you!!!! > > just who decides what is the correct list of stuff to talk about on this > list... > Usually if you get spanked by one of the people who also have their names on the CentOS team members list it is time to stop. Any one else is just fair game! ;-P -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 250 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20081015/35cd7483/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] OT: is parted reliable?
- Next message: [CentOS] OT: is parted reliable?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list