[CentOS] new list proposal - meaningless

Spike Turner wrote:
> perhaps that is why "core" issues in CentOS like the kernel 
> and samba are ignored by the developers? Examples :-
> 
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-October/066143.html

We are not going to rebase except if upstream does. And maybe nobody
answered that because nobody is seeing "issues" with that samba
version?

> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-October/066154.html

Yeah, that one is a problem. 

Ralph
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20081016/ad3bcb84/attachment-0001.sig>