[CentOS] Re: DHCP static hosts and subnet configuration
John
jses27 at gmail.comSat Oct 18 01:03:26 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: DHCP static hosts and subnet configuration
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: DHCP static hosts and subnet configuration
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Scott Silva (Mail Scanner) Wrote: >TCP/IP works the same way no matter what country you are from. The terms are >the same, and if someone uses the wrong term, it is not the language >difference, that person just learned the wrong term. Yes, works the same in all Countries. Layers 1,2,3 of the OSI Stack. I guess what I should have said was Subnet. >A subnet is what you get when you finish subnetting. One is a noun, one is a >verb. It can only be done the way it was designed to be done. You can do some >very creative things with CIDR now, but that was created more as a way to make >smaller routing tables than any other reason. Correct there. Classless Inter Domain Routing, never really got into doing that. Largest I have dealt with was 1500 nodes and cidr is not needed there. My main thing has always been getting a network provider to also provide failover redudance. Had one dealing with lighting fiber and that was a nightmare. Maybe I can get a few CIDR pointers from you. :-) JohnStanley
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: DHCP static hosts and subnet configuration
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: DHCP static hosts and subnet configuration
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list