on 10-28-2008 3:25 AM William L. Maltby spake the following: > On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 00:21 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: >> Ian Masters wrote: >>> which show your swap partition, whereas on my problem system, 'swapon >>> -s' produces no output at all. >>> >> ok, that confirms your supposition, you have no swap configured. > > Although I disagree, some on this list have proclaimed that a "properly > configured" (for the intended use I guess) system needs no swap. > >> <snip> > A properly configured system "can" need no swap for day to day operations, but you only need *one* runaway process to max out the memory and bring the system to a crashing halt. A little swap is just like a cheap insurance policy. You hope you don't need it, but if you do, you are glad it was there. Even though the recommended swap is 2 times system memory, I have never made a swap partition over 2 GB. Maybe I am also flirting with disaster, but haven't been bit yet in years. Usually a run away process that hits into swap gives enough time for the kernel to kill it off before the whole system dumps. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 250 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20081028/4d431c97/attachment-0004.sig>