Spike Turner wrote: > perhaps that is why "core" issues in CentOS like the kernel > and samba are ignored by the developers? Examples :- > > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-October/066143.html Thats a bit of a dribveby waste of space post that does not really merit a reply from anyone. Also if that was something that concerns you so much, what have you done about it ? > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-October/066154.html Johnny has been working on those. > If the CentOS devs don't have time to answer key questions such as > on the kernel but have time to consider fragmenting the mailing list > who wins/loses? What barriers did you run into when you tried to help with the situation and try to be a better member of the community ? - KB