Scott Silva wrote: > >> 2) i would like to also know about MX records >> >> i mean DNS server having MX with same priority n MX with different priority >> >> i right now have a primary n secondary mail server that is dns server with >> different MX records and its workin fine >> >> if i have 2 servers with same MX priority do i need to create the same >> users on both my centos servers so tht if one server fails othe one is >> operational . i do presume the above is correct or is there any other way >> >> > You usually have your backup MX just hold the mail and forward it to the > primary when it comes back up. To have a second server become operational if > the first fails is not just about backups, it is about HA (high availability). > There is more info on HA on the Linux HA website > http://www.linux-ha.org/ > There's a nice milter for sendmail called milter-ahead. This works great on a backup mailserver as it will look 'ahead' to the primary and if it is up, it will not accept the email. This might sound silly at first, but if you don't do it this way, you'll find a huge queue of spam to nonexistant users on the backup server which can't be returned to the bad addresses spammers use... or you wind up bouncing spam to those that did not send it... a horrid situation. I'm not understanding your using the same MX priority settings, as there is not really a default server. Mail winds up split between both places instead of hitting the primary first. Spammers however will find your backup server and send directly to it, in order to try to circumvent rejects from the primary and create bounces out of the secondary. This situation is almost as bad as having an open relay. You can land yourself on a lot of blacklists quickly and become a part of the spam problem easily. If you do wish to have two equally accessible mailservers, users will need to be replicated. Clustering or something like Xen could be a better option. Best, John Hinton