Phil Schaffner wrote: > On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 14:59 -0500, Monty Shinn wrote: >> Greetings. >> >> I am in the process of installing 5.1 64 bit on a server. The server >> has 2 3ware cards: 9550SX 12 port, and a 8006 2 port, both SATA. > > Any reason not to use 5.2? Will save a lot of updates, and perhaps some > headaches. > <snip> > > I have vague recollections of having fixed similar problems by tweaking > the device ordering in initrd and/or modprobe.conf; however, backing up > a step, why do you need to change the order to make things work? You > can install GRUB on the boot device MBR, whatever that may be, and put > the OS on the device you want it on without changing the ordering. > > Phil > <snip> Phil, There are a couple of reasons, although they may make no sense. First, I did not want a multiple point of failure. If the boot loader is on the MBR of /dev/sda, and the os is on /dev/sdb, then you have a multiple point of failure. If either card dies, then I am hosed. It would be *similar* to running a RAID0 on the os. Not a good idea IMHO. Also, if I wanted to replace the "data" drives in the future, I couldn't just unmount the partition and replace the drives. The boot loader would be gone as well. I did not find an option during the install prep to re-locate grub to the MBR of /dev/sdb. I probably should try the text-based installer to see if there are more options. Heck, I may just remove the 9550 board until the initial os install is completed. That should accomplish what I am trying to achieve. Just seems like there should be a more elegant way of doing this. I am installing 5.1 because I have the isos on hand. I was just going to let yum update me to 5.2... Thanks for your help, Monty