Thanks guys for ur immediate reply do apprecite i try to incoporate some of the RBLS and check it out regards simon > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Ned Slider <ned at unixmail.co.uk> wrote: > >> Ralph Angenendt wrote: >> >>> fabian dacunha wrote: >>> >>>> its a offtopic question but really apprecite if someone would advise n >>>> help >>>> i have been running a mil server with sendmail >>>> >>>> and have sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org as my dnsbl. >>>> >>>> i had other servers which are alredy out now >>>> that is relays.ordb.org and dsbl.org have already been out of my >>>> sendmail >>>> config. >>>> >>>> any one knows of ny other servers i could add in my sendmail config >>>> >>> >>> Any list which you trust enough to make the decision *which* mails you >>> accept for you. >>> Which would leave "none" for me. >>> >>> Even sbl.spamhaus.org contains a blacklist, which sometimes lists >>> because of the name the machine has (CBL that is). >>> >>> Ralph >>> >>> >> DNSBL has information on many RBLs together with statistics on their >> effectiveness: >> >> http://stats.dnsbl.com/ >> >> Other popular RBLs besides Spamhaus include Spamcop, PSBL and >> uceprotect. >> >> As Ralph says, any RBL should be used with a certain amount of caution >> as >> it has the potential to cause FPs (some more so than others). An >> alternative >> approach is to use such RBLs as part of a scoring system such as >> SpamAssassin. This is particularly useful for RBLs that you don't trust >> to >> outright reject mail at the smtp level. >> >> If you want to improve on the performance of sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, I >> would >> first look at switching to the combined zen.spamhaus.org zone which also >> contains the pbl.spamhaus.org zone. My own data shows >> sbl-xbl.spamhaus.orgto block around 50% of spam whereas >> zen.spamhaus.org hits on around 90% of spam with very few FPs for me - >> YMMV. You should monitor performance closely. >> >> > Anyone have any experience dealing with SURBL? I have a client who's > domain > and IP is not listed in SURBL, but their client in China is using SURBL > and > my client's emails are getting blocked. Can't seem to find how SURBL is > blocking them > > -- > -matt > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.