[CentOS] Alarming (?) smartd reports
nate
centos at linuxpowered.netThu Sep 11 18:15:43 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] Alarming (?) smartd reports
- Next message: [CentOS] Alarming (?) smartd reports
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
MHR wrote: > I was going to laugh this off 'cuz how many manufacturers support > Linux, but I was pleasantly surprised, twice, when I found that a) > Seagate does and b) the seatools for Linux produced no errors on the > long test. I wasn't aware there was a seatools for Linux, I meant to refer to the bootable versions of the tools that run outside of any OS. But perhaps the vendor tools have improved and can reliably detect faults from within an OS, it's been several years since I've had to use them. nate
- Previous message: [CentOS] Alarming (?) smartd reports
- Next message: [CentOS] Alarming (?) smartd reports
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list