[CentOS] Picasa vs. native photo management apps
Ralph Angenendt
ra+centos at br-online.deTue Sep 16 10:25:46 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] Picasa vs. native photo management apps
- Next message: [CentOS] Picasa vs. native photo management apps
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niki Kovacs wrote: > Are there some tasks one performs with Picasa that one can't perform > with these native programs? Or is there some other well-made photo > management software that you can recommend as a replacement for Picasa? f-spot <http://f-spot.org/Main_Page> is rather nice, but needs mono and a halfways current Gnome. And then there is digikam (IIRC) in kde. And yes, those programs (as picasa) do a rather good job of *managing* pictures, which isn't too easy to do with g-thumb and other programs like that. Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080916/6ed2704a/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] Picasa vs. native photo management apps
- Next message: [CentOS] Picasa vs. native photo management apps
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list