On Tuesday 02 September 2008 18:25:10 MHR wrote: > On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Scott Silva <ssilva at sgvwater.com> wrote: > > But Windows for Workgroups 3.1 really screams on the newer hardware! ;-P > > For shame! WfW was 3.11, 3.1.1, IIRC > and it just screams, or did, or so I heard - > never used it. I did. It was better than 95, and better than 98 first edition. > I stuck with 3.1 until 98 was due out and then, > finally, caved and bought (!) a copy of 95. > > In fact, my son is still using 98, but I think I've finally convinced > him to go to XP - I bought him some really neat flash drives that he > really likes but that do not work with 98 at all. Heh, heh, heh,... > USB drives should work without any problem at all, assuming he is using 98SE. They didn't work in 98 first edition, nor in NT4 or Win2000 - again, from memory, which could be faulty. Anne -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080902/b45a435f/attachment-0004.sig>